Solution: NAV Oversight

Automate Fund Admin vs Shadow NAV Holdings Control

Fund Admin vs Shadow NAV Holdings Control

Fund Recs automates the comparison of holdings between the Fund Administrator and the Shadow NAV. The platform standardises data, runs detailed position checks, and highlights discrepancies instantly — giving teams confidence that official and independent records are fully aligned.

For the Analysts

Automated holdings comparison
Reconcile positions between administrator holdings and Shadow NAV data at security level.
Granular field checks
Validate quantity, price, market value, currency, and key security attributes.
Configurable tolerances
Apply thresholds by asset class or fund to focus on material differences.

For Oversight Teams

Exception dashboards
View breaks by fund, asset type, or security with clear categorisation.
Audit-ready reporting
Generate structured reports showing administrator data, Shadow NAV values, variances, and resolution notes.

How It Works

Data ingestion and standardisation
Load administrator holdings and Shadow NAV files in any format. Fund Recs converts both into a consistent structure.
Holdings matching engine
Compare positions field by field - quantity, price, value, and currency - and flag any mismatches automatically.
Exception management
Assign, comment, and resolve breaks directly in the platform. Every action is logged for audit.
Scalable automation
Run daily holdings checks across full fund ranges in minutes.

Why Fund Admin vs Shadow NAV Holdings Control Matters

Independent verification of holdings is a core oversight requirement. Differences between administrator records and Shadow NAV data can indicate valuation errors, missing trades, or data issues. Automating this control improves accuracy, reduces manual work, and ensures official and independent records remain fully aligned.

Book a demo Talk to an expert

NAV Oversight

Fund Admin vs Shadow NAV Holdings Control

Fund Recs automates Fund Admin vs Shadow NAV holdings checks by standardising data and running detailed field-level comparisons. Differences are flagged instantly, with dashboards and workflows that make review and resolution fast and transparent.

Problem

Fund Admin vs Shadow NAV Holdings Challenge

Administrator and Shadow NAV holdings are often produced using different systems, data sources, and timing. Manual comparison is slow and difficult to scale, especially across large or complex portfolios. Small discrepancies can be hard to identify and investigate without automation.

Solution

How Fund Recs Helps

Accurate holdings data underpins valuation, investor reporting, and regulatory confidence. Automating this control strengthens independent oversight, reduces operational risk, and ensures holdings used in NAV calculations are complete, consistent, and reliable.

Benefits

Why It Matters

Strong control over manual bookings supports accurate NAVs, clean audits, and regulatory confidence. Automating this process reduces operational risk, improves transparency, and ensures every manual adjustment is reviewed, justified, and fully traceable.

Automated Internal vs External Checks

Take internal data and compare it with the various components forming part of the external NAV.

Smart Exception Routing

Reduce investigation time with clear exception routing and root-cause tags

Audit-Ready Evidence Packs

Strengthen audit readiness with evidence packs - reconciliations, exceptions, approvals.

NAV Oversight Confidence

Improve confidence in NAV integrity across funds and administrators

See Fund Recs in Action

Explore how our Fund Admin vs Shadow NAV Holdings Control strengthens NAV confidence and reduces operational risk.

Book a demo Talk to an expert